Russian River RRWAMP Document Catalog

 

Short Description Citation
Aggregates
Aggregate Management Plan Phil Williams and Associates. 1997. Upper Russian River Aggregate Resources Management Plan Mendocino County. Mendocino County Water Agency.
Influence on Hydrology Simon, Li and Associates, Inc. 1991. Hydrologic Impacts of Gravel Mining on the Russian River.
Geomorphic Effects Florsheim, J. and P. Goodwin. 1995. Geomorphic and Hydrologic Conditions in the Russian River, California: Historic Trends and Existing Conditions. contact for CD
Extraction Guidance National Marine Fisheries Service. 2005. National Gravel Extraction Guidance.
Extraction Guidance National Marine Fisheries Service. Federal Register Notice for National Gravel Extraction Guidance. Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 116 / Friday, June 17, 2005 / Notices
Geomorphic Effects Norman, D. K., C. J. Cederholm and W. S. Lingley, Jr. 1998. Floodplains, salmon habitat, and sand and gravel mining. Washington Geology 26: 3-28.
Geomorphic Effects Castro, J. and B. Cluer. 2003. Instream Aggregate Mining Issues in Oregon. Prepared for U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service and Oregon Fish and Wildlife Office, Portland Oregon.
Geomorphic Effects Anonymous. 2006. Sediment Removal from Active Stream Channels in Oregon: Considerations for Federal Agencies for the Evaluation of Sediment Removal Actions from Oregon Streams. Developed with support from: US Fish and Wildlife Service, National Marine Fisheries Service,US Army Corps of Engineers US Environmental Protection Agency.
Geomorphic Effects National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. 2004. Sediment Removal From Freshwater Salmonid Habitat: Guidelines to NOAA Fisheries Staff for the Evaluation of Sediment Removal Actions from California Streams. NOAA Fisheries - Southwest Region.
  Central District, Dept. of Water Resources. 1984. Upper Russian River Gravel and Erosion Study. County of Mendocino
Anadromous Fish
Land Use Effects on Salmonids Harris, R. R., S. D. Kocher, and K. M. Kull. 2001. Effects of County Land Use Policies and Management Practices on Anadromous Salmonids and their Habitats Sonoma, Marin, San Mateo, Santa Cruz and Monterey Counties, California. The FishNet 4C Program.
Fisheries Restoration Plan for Russian River Basin Coey, R., Nossaman-Pearce, S., Brooks, C. and Young, Z. CDFG. 2002 Draft. Russian River Basin Fisheries Restoration Plan. California Deprtment of Fish and Game
Recovery of California Coho CDFG. 2004. Recovery Strategy for the California Coho Salmon.
Fish Passage / Barriers Taylor, R. 2003. Russian River Stream Crossing Inventory and Fish Passage Evaluation, Final Report and Appendices
Fish Passage / Barriers Flanagan, S. A. 1998. Methods for inventory and environmental risk assessment of road drainage crossings.
Biological Assessment Entrix, Inc.. 2000. Russian River Biological Assessment Interim Report
Biological Assessment Entrix, Inc.. 2002. Russian River Biological Assessment Interim Report, flow Related Habitat
Biological Assessment Entrix, Inc.. 2004. Russian River Biological Assessment Report, Section 1
Fish Passage / Barriers California Fish Passage Assessment Database References
Habitat Opperman, J. J. 2002. Anadromous Fish Habitat in California’s Mediterranean-climate Watersheds: Influences of Riparian Vegetation, Instream Large Woody Debris, and Watershed-scale Land Use. Dissertation
Restoration Opperman, J. J., and A. M. Merenlender. 24(3):822–834. Aug 2004. The effectiveness of riparian restoration for improving instream fish habitat in four hardwood-dominated California streams. North American Journal of Fisheries Management.
Status California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG). 2002. "Status Review of California Coho Salmon North of San Francisco." Report to the California Fish and Game Commission. 336 pp.
Fish Passage / Barriers Taylor, R.N. and M. Love. 2003. "California Salmonid Stream Habitat Restoration Manual, Part IX: Fish Passage Evaluation at Stream Crossings." California Department of Fish and Game. 100 pp.
Temperature Berman, C. 1998. "Summary of Temperature Preference Ranges and Effects for Life States of Seven Species of Salmon and Trout (Appendix A)." US EPA Region 10.
Fish Passage / Barriers NOAA National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS). 2001. "Guidelines for Salmonid Passage at Stream Crossings." NMFS Southwest Regional Office.
Fish Passage / Barriers Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2004. Fish Passage Technical Assistance [Web site].
Fish Passage / Barriers Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2000. Fish Passage Barrier and Surface Water Diversion Screening Assessment and Prioritization Manual
Habitat Restoration Flosi, G., S. Downie, J. Hopelain, M. Bird, R. Coey, and B. Collins. 1998. "California Salmonid Stream Habitat Restoration Manual. Third Edition." State of California Resources Agency, California Department of Fish and Game, Inland Fisheries Division. 495 pp.
Riparian Habitat Restoration California Salmonid Stream Habitat Restoration Manual. Part XI - Riparian Habitat Restoration
Fish Passage / Barriers California Salmonid Stream Habitat Restoration Manual. Part IX - Fish Passage Evaluation at Stream Crossings
Fish Passage / Barriers California Salmonid Stream Habitat Restoration Manual. Part IX - Fish Passage Evaluation at Stream Crossings - Errata
Russian River Fisheries Hopkirk, J. D. et al. 1980. Technical report on fisheries of the Russian River. Prepared for Sonoma County Planning Department.
History of Salmonid Decline Steiner Environmental Consulting. 1996. A history of salmonid decline in the Russian River.
Steelhead Distribution Sonoma County Water Agency. 2003. Upper Russian River Steelhead Distribution Study
Fish Monitoring Sonoma County Water Agency. 2002. Mirabel Rubber Dam/Wohler Pool Fish Sampling Program
Spawning Sonoma County Water Agency. 2003. Chinook Spawning Program
Salmonid Recovery Using Watershed Prioritization Handbook for Prioritizing Watershed Protection and Restoration to Aid Recovery of Native Salmon. 1995.
Conservation Plan for Salmon and Steelhead Humbolt Bay Watershed Advisory Committee. 2005. Humbolt Bay Watershed Salmon and Steelhead Conservation Plan.
Restoration Project Monitoring Harris, R. R. et al. 2002. Part 1. Monitoring Fish Habitat Restoration Projects. University of California, Berkeley Center for Forestry and Center for the Assessment and Monitoring of Forest Environmental Resources
Fish Monitoring Sonoma and Marin County Fish Survey Reports listing
Instream Flows California Department of Fish and Game and National Marine Fisheries Service. June 17, 2002 (Draft). Guidelines for Maintaining Instream Flows to Protect Fisheries Resources Downstream of Water Diversions in Mid-California Coast Streams.
Bypass Flows Moyle, P. B. and G. M. Kondolf. 2000. Fish Bypass Flows for Coastal Watersheds: A Review of Proposed Approaches for the State Water Resources Control Board. June 12, 2000.
Indices Knopp, C. Testing Indices of Cold Water Fish Habitat. 1993. North Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board and Californina Department of Forestry.
Temperature Carter, K. 2006. The effects of temperature on steelhead trout, coho salmon, and chinook salmon biology and function by life stage: Implications for Klamath Basin TMDLs. North Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board
Sediments North Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board. 2006. Desired salmonid freshwater habitat conditions for sediment related indices North Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board
Sediments Suttle, K.B., Power, M.E., Levine, J.M., and McNeely, C. 2004. How Fine Sediment in Riverbeds Impairs Growth and Survival of Juvenile Salmonids. Ecological Applications 14: 969-974.
Woody Debris Stillwater Sciences. 1997. A review of coho salmon life history to assess potential limiting factors and the implications of historical removal of large woody debris in coastal Mendocino County. Stillwater Sciences, 2532 Durant Avenue, Suite 201, Berkeley, CA 94704
Restoration NOAA. 1996. Coastal Salmon Conservation: Working Guidance for Comprehensive Salmon Restoration Initiatives on the Pacific Coast
Fish Passage / Barriers State Coastal Conservancy. 2005. Fish Passage Improvement in California Watersheds. Assessments and Recommendations by the Fish Passage Forum.
Assessment Methods
Site Specific Wetland Assessment Collins, J.N., E.D. Stein, M. Sutula, R. Clark, A.E. Fetscher, L. Grenier, C. Grosso, and A. Wiskind. 2006. California Rapid Assessment Method (CRAM) for Wetlands and Riparian Areas. Version 4.2.3.
General Sutula, M. A. et al. 2006. A Practical Guide for the Development of a Wetland Assessment Method: The California Experience. Journal of the American Water Resources Association February 2006.
General Metzeling, L., B. Chessman, R. Hardwick, and V. Wong. 2003. Rapid assessment of rivers using macroinvertebrates: The role and experience and comparisons with quantitative methods. Hydrobiologia 520: 39-52.
Stream Bioassessment California Department of Fish and Game - Aquatic Bioassessment Lab. 2003. California Stream Bioassessment Procedure.
Indicators of Biological Integrity (IBI) California Department of Fish and Game - Aquatic Bioassessment Lab. 1999. An Index of Biological Integrity for First to Third Order Russian River Tributary Streams.
Macroinvertebrate Taxa California Department of Fish and Game - Aquatic Bioassessment Lab. 2003. List of Californian Macroinvertebrate Taxa and Standard Taxonomic Effort.
Cumulative Effects
Cumulative Watershed Effects Dunne, T. et al. 2001. A scientific basis for the prediction of cumulative watershed effects.
Cumulative Watershed Effects Reid, L. M. 1993. Research and cumulative watershed effects. Pacific Southwest Research Station. General Technical Report PSW-GTR-141.
Cumulative Watershed Effects Reid, L. M. 2001. Cumulative Watershed Effects: Then and Now. WCM Newsletter Summer 2001.
Cumulative Watershed Effects Lee H. MacDonald, Drew Coe, and Sandra Litschert. No Date. Assessing Cumulative Watershed Effects in the Central Sierra Nevada: Hillslope Measurements and Catchment-scale Modeling. Department of Forest, Range, and Watershed Stewardship. Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523
Cumulative Watershed Effects R. R. Ziemer, J. Lewis, R. M. Rice, and T. E. Lisle. 1991. Modeling the Cumulative Watershed Effects of Forest Management Strategies. Journal of Environmental Quality 20: 36-42
Cumulative Watershed Effects Reid, L. M. 1998. Cumulative Watershed Effects and Watershed Analysis. Chapter 19 in unknown publication.
Cumulative Watershed Effects Reid, L. M. 1998. Cumulative Watershed Effects: Caspar Creek and Beyond. Chapter 13 in USDA Forest Service General Technical Report PSW-GTR-168-Web.
Dam Effects
  Batalla, R.J., C.M. Gomez, and G.M. Kondolf. 2004. River impoundment and changes in flow regime, Ebro River basin, northeastern Spain. Journal of Hydrology 290: 117-136.
  Cope M. W. and G. B. Griggs. 2003. Reductions in Fluvial Sediment Discharge by Coastal Dams in California and Implications for Beach sustainability. The Journal of Geology 111: 167–182.
  Richard, G. and P. Julien. 2003. Dam impacts on and restoration of an alluvial river - Rio Grande, New Mexico. International Journal of Sediment Research 18: 89-96.
EMDS
NetWeaver Reynolds, K. M. 1999. NetWeaver Users Guide, Version 1.1
EMDS Reynolds, K. M. 1999. EMDS Users Guide, Version 2.2
Knowledge Base Reynolds, K. M. 2000. Knowledge-based assessment of watershed condition. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 27: 315-333.
Knowledge Base Stoms, D. A. 2000. A knowledge base to assess site suitability for ecological field stations at UC Merced
EMDS Bourgeron, P. S. 2000. Conducting large-scale conservation evaluation and conservation area selection using a knowledge-based system. International Conference on Integrating GIS and Environmental odeling (GIS/EM4): Problems, Prospects, and Research Needs. Banff, Alberta, Canada, September 2 - 8, 2000.
NetWeaver Tran, L. T. et al. 2002. Fuzzy decision analysis for integrated environmental vulnerability assessment of the mid atlantic region. Environmental Management 29: 845-859.
Erosion/Sediment
Sediment Production Ajay Prasad, David G Tarboton, Charles H Luce, Thomas A. Black. A GIS Tool to Analyze Forest Road Sediment Production and Stream Impacts. Presented at 25th ESRI Users Conference, July 25-29, 2005, San Diego, California
Planning
California Coastal Sediment Management Master Plan
Fauna
Indicator Taxa Hilty, J.A., and A. Merenlender. 2000. Faunal indicator taxa selection for monitoring ecosystem health. Biological Conservation. 92(2):185-197.
Riparian Corridors Hilty, Jodi, and Adina Merenlender. 2002. Wildlife Activity along Creek Corridors. Practical Winery and Vineyard. Nov/Dec 2002:6-11.
Biodiversity Hilty, J.A., and A. Merenlender. 2003. Studying Biodiversity on Private Lands. Conservation Biology 17(1):132-137.
GAP Analysis Davis, F. W. et al. 1998. The California Gap Analysis Project--Final Report. University of California, Santa Barbara, CA.
Riparian Corridors Hilty, Jodi, and Adina Merenlender. 2003. Use of riparian corridors and vineyards by mammalian predators in northern California. Conservation Biology 18: 126-135.
Macroinvertebrates Kennedy, T.B., A.M. Merenlender, and G.L. Vinyard. 2000. A comparsion of riparian condition and aquatic invertebrate community indices in central Nevada. Western North American Naturalist, 60(3):255-272.
Fire
Fire Regime Condition 2005. Interagency Fire Regime Condition Class Guidebook, Version 1.2.
Reference Conditons Reference Condition Characteristics for Forested Biophysical Settings, Western U.S.
Reference Conditons Reference Condition Characteristics for Grassland Biophysical Settings, Western U.S.
Reference Conditons Reference Condition Characteristics for Shrubland Biophysical Settings, Western U.S.
Reference Conditons Reference Condition Characteristics for Woodland Biophysical Settings, Western U.S.
Geology
Geology Haydon, W. D. California Department of Conservation
California Geological Survey. 2007. Landslide Potential Evaluation, Russian River Watershed, Sonoma and Mendocino Counties, California  
Geology Shervais, J. W. 2004. Multistage origin of coast range ophiolite… International Geology Review 46: 289-315
Geology Wright, T. 1998. Overview of Sonoma County Geology. 
Geology Watershed Background: Geology. 
Geology Radbruch-Hall, D. H., Colton, R. B., Davies, W. E. Lucchitta, I., Skipp, B. A. and Varnes, D. J. 1992. Landslide Overview Map of the Conterminous United States. US Geological Survey Professional Paper 1183.
Geology Mendocino County Geology Publications
Geology Sonoma County Geology Publications
Geology Russian River Technical Advisory Committee Hydrology and Geomorphology Workshop 1994
Geology California Department of Conservation, Division of Mines and Geology. No Date. Guidelines for Preparing Geologic Reports for Regional-Scale Environmental and Resource Management Planning. Note 52
Geology California Department of Conservation, Division of Mines and Geology. No Date. Factors influencing landslides in forested terrain. Note 50
Geology Radbruch-Hall, D. H. 1982. Landslide overview map of the conterminous United States. USGS Professional Paper 1183.
Geology Radbruch-Hall, D. H. 1982. Landslide overview map of the conterminous United States. USGS Professional Paper 1183. Portions relevant to Russian River
Groundwater
Groundwater Trout Unlimited. 2007. Gone to the Well Once to Often: The Importance of Groundwater to Rivers in the West.
Groundwater Groundwater Issues - Sonoma County
Groundwater Su, G. W., J. Jasperse, D. Seymour, and J. Constantz. 2004. Estimation of Hydraulic Conductivity in an Alluvial System Using Temperatures. Ground Water 42:890-901.
Historical Background
Early Conditions Early conditions and history of the upper Russian River
Development of Water Resources Beach, R. F. 2002. History of the develoment of water resources of the Russian River. Sonoma County Water Agency.
Development of Water Resources History of the Development of the Water Resources of the Russian River
Potter Valley Project Potter Valley Project (FERC No. 77) Overview
Salmonid Decline Steiner Environmental Consulting. 1996. A history of salmonid decline in the Russian River.
Indicators of Hydrologic Alteration
Paper Richter, B. D. et. al. 1997. How much water does a river need? Freshwater Biology 37: 231-249.
Paper Richter, B. D. et. al. 1996. A method for assessing hydrologic alteration in ecosystems. Conservation Biology 10: 1165-1174.
User's Manual Nature Conservancy. 2005. Indicators of Hydrologic Alteration User's Manual, Version 7. The Nature Conservancy with Smythe Scientific Software and Totten Software Design.
Paper Olden, J. D. and N. L. Poff. 2003. Redundancy and the choice of hydrologic indices for characterizing streamflow regimes. River Research and Applications 19: 101-121.
Paper Poff, N. L. 1996. A Hydrogeography of unregulated streams in the United States and an examination of scale dependence in some hydrologic descriptors. Freshwater Biology 36: 71-91.
User's Manual Henricksen, J. A. 2006. Users’ Manual for the Hydroecological Integrity Assessment Process Software (including the New Jersey Assessment Tools). USGS Open File Report 2006-1093
Paper Poff, N. L. and J. V. Ward. 1989. Implications of streamflow variability and predictability for lotic community structure: a regional analysis of streamflow pattern. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 46: 1805-1818.
Paper Richter, B. D. et. al. 1998. A spatial assessment of hydrologic alteration within a river network. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management 14: 329-340.
Paper Richter, B. D. et. al. 2006. A collaborative and adaptive process for developing environmental flow recommendations. River Research and Applications 22: 297-318.
Paper Richter, B. D. and H. E. Richter. 2000. Prescribing flood regimes to sustain riparian ecosystems along meandering rivers. Conservation Biology 14: 1467-1478.
Indicators
SF Bay Fish Index San Francisco Bay Fish Index
Invertebrate Community Indices Kennedy, T.B., A.M. Merenlender, and G.L. Vinyard. 2000. A comparsion of riparian condition and aquatic invertebrate community indices in central Nevada. Western North American Naturalist, 60(3):255-272.
Indicators National Research Council. 2000. Ecological indicators for the nation. National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D. C. Pages 76-83 have a good discussion on using diversity indices across different spatial scales.
Indicators of Rangeland Health Pellant, M. et al. 2000. Interpreting Indicators of Rangeland Health, Version 3. Bureau of Land Management. Technical Reference 1734-6.
  USEPA - Office of Water. 2000. Stressor Identification Guidance Document. EPA/822/B-00/025
Land Use / Land Cover
NLDC Coverages Overview Homer, C. et. al. 2007. Completion of the 2001 National Land Cover Database for the Conterminous United States. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 73: 337-341.
Review of the effects of land use change on streams Jacobson, R.B., S.R. Femmer, and R.A. McKenney. 2001. "Land-use Changes and the Physical Habitat of Streams: A Review with Emphasis on Studies within the U.S. Geological Survey Federal-State Cooperative." USGS. Circular 1175.
Patch Dynamics
  Betts, M. and R.Taylor. 2002. An Indicator Species Approach to Monitoring Forest Fragmentation in New Brunswick, Canada
  Indicators of Forest Fragmentation
  Lindenmeyer, D. Date Unknown. The Development and Implementation of Landscape Metrics for Reporting Forest Fragmentation at Field and Landscape Levels
  Riitters, K. H. et al. 1997. Assessing habitat suitability at multiple scales: a landscape level approach. Biological Conservation 81: 191-202.
Riparian
Restoration Opperman, J. and A. M. Merenlender. 2004. The effectiveness of riparian restoration for improving instream fish habitat in four hardwood-dominated California streams. North American Journal of Fisheries Management. Vol 24(3):822-834.
Corridors Assessing Conditions of Riparian-Wetland Corridors at the Areawide Level with Proper Functioning Condition
Buffers Ledwith, T. 1996. The Effects of Buffer Strip Width on Air Temperature and Relative Humidity in a Stream Riparian Zone
Large Woody Debris Opperman, J. J., 2005. Large Woody Debris and Land Management in California's Hardwood-Dominated Watersheds, Environmental Management 35: 266-277. (potential indicators)
Riparian Influence on Anadromous Fish Opperman, J.J. 2002. Anadromous Fish Habitat in California's Mediterranean-Climate Watersheds: Influences of Riparian Vegetation, Instream Large Woody Debris, and Watershed-scale Land Use. PhD Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
Bibliography Lassettre, N.S. 1999. "Annotated Bibliography on the Ecology, Management, and Physical Effects of Large Woody Debris (LWD) in Stream Ecosystems." Department of Landscape Architecture and Environmental Planning, University of California, Berkeley. Prepared for the California Department of Forestry.
Riparian Restoration Opperman, J., and A. Merenlender. 2003. Passive restoration of degraded riparian corridors in the Russian River basin: consideration of hydrology, livestock, and deer herbivory. P. M. Faber, editor California Riparian Systems: Processes and Floodplain Management, Ecology, and Restoration. 2001 Riparian Habitat and Floodplains Conference Proceedings. Riparian Habitat Joint Venture, Sacramento, CA.
Mammal Use of Riparian Hilty, J. A. and A. M. Merenlender. 2004. Use of Riparian Corridors and Vineyards by Mammalian Predators in Northern California, Conservation Biology, 18(1):132-137. 
Buffers Reid, L. M. and Hilton, S. 1998. Buffering the Buffer.
Buffers Bren, L. J. no date. A review of buffer strip design algorithms.
Santa Rosa Creeks, Riparian Corridors and Storm Drainage. City of Santa Rosa, CA.
Riparian Corridor Assessemnt Butt, A. Z., M.l Ayers, S. Swanson and P. T. Tueller. 2001. Riparian Corridor Assessment: Combining Vegetation and Stream Morphology Classifications Into A GIS Database. 
Deer Herbivory Opperman, J. J. and Merenlender, A. M. 2000. Deer herbivory and ecological constraint to restoration of riparian corridors. Restoration Ecology 8: 41-47.
Riparian Birds Giusti, G. A., R. J. Keiffer, and C. E. Vaughn. 2003. The Bird Community of an Oak Woodland Stream. California Fish and Game 89:72-80.
Status Kondolf, G. M. et al. 1996. Chapter 36 - Status of Riparian Habitat. in: Sierra Nevada Ecosystem Project: Final report to Congress, Vol. II, Assessments and scientific basis for management options. Davis: University of California, Centers for Water and Wildland Resources, 1996.
Riparian Birds California Partners in Flight. 2004. Riparian Bird Conservation Plan, Version 2.0
Effects of Forestry Practice on Riparian Areas Grant, G. 1988. The RAPID Technique: A new method for evaluating downstream effects of forestry practices on riparian zones. USDA Forest Service. Pacific Northwest Research Station. General Technical Report PNW-GTR-220
Bibliography Riparian Ecosystems of California Bibliography
Roads and Crossings
  Robison, E. G. et al. 1999. Oregon Road and Stream Crossing Restoration Guide
  Taylor, R. 2003. Russian River Stream Crossing Inventory and Fish Passage Evaluation, Final Report and Appendices
  Trombulak, S. C. and C. A. Frissell. 2000. Review of ecological effects of roads on terrestrial and aquatic communities. Conservation Biology 14: 18-30.
  Committee of Ecological Impacts of Road Density. 2005. Assessing and managing the ecological impacts of paved roads. National Academies Press
  La Plante, D. No Date. Forest Road Sediment Production Analysis Using Dynamic Segmentation
  Ritters, K. H. and Wickham, J. D. 2003. How far to the nearest road. Frontiers in Ecology 1: 125-129.
  Flanagan, S. A. et al. 1998. Methods for Inventory and Environmental Risk Assessment of Road Drainage Crossings. Forest Service - Technology and Development Program
  Pacific River Council. 2002. Roads and Rivers: An Implementation Guide to the Forest Service Roads Policy.
  Forman, R. T. T. No Date. Spatial models as an emerging foundation of road system ecology and a handle for transportation planning and policy
RRWAMP
  Russian River Watershed Council. 2002. Plan of Action.
  Russian River Watershed Council. 2004. Russian River Watershed Adaptive Management Plan Final Draft Scope of Work
  Circuit Riders Productions, Inc. 2003. Russian River Interactive Information System (RRIIS) Task 13 – Russian River data gaps and prioritization of data needs
  USACE San Francisco District and California Resources Agency. 1998. Russian River Watershed Management and Protection Study - Project Study Plan.
Public Outreach Russian River Watershed Adaptive Management Plan Brochure
Public Outreach Russian River Watershed Adaptive Management Plan Brochure Baseline Assessment Fact Sheet
Sediment
Sediment North Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board. 2006. Desired Salmonid Freshwater Habitat Conditions for Sediment Related Indices. North Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board
Subasin Specific Studies
Maacama Creek Lackey, L. and L. Marcus. No Date. Prioritizing restoration activities for salmonid habitat within a watershed.
Willow Creek Mendocino Redwood Company. 2001. Willow / Freezeout Creeks Watershed Analysis
Selected Tributaries
National Marine Fisheries Service. 2007. Draft Habitat Restoration and Conservation Plan for Anadromous Salmonid. Habitat in Selected Tributaries of the Russian River Basin
Austin Creek Sotoyome Resource Conservation District. Laurel Marcus and Associates. 2005. Austin Creek Watershed Assessment.
Maacama Creek
Sotoyome Resource Conservation District. Laurel Marcus and Associates. 2004. Maacama Creek Watershed Assessment
Copeland Creek
Sotoyome Resource Conservation District. Laurel Marcus and Associates. 2004. Copeland Creek Watershed Assessment
Coastal Tributaries
Sotoyome Resource Conservation District. Laurel Marcus and Associates. 2005. Coastal Tributaries Tributary Improvement Program 
Russian River Creeks
Sotoyome Resource Conservation District. Laurel Marcus and Associates. 2004. Russian River Creek Monitoring & Assessment Summary Report, 1998 - 2004 
Upper Russian River Mendocino Redwood Company. 2004. Watershed Analysis and Monitoring for Mendocino Redwood Company’s Ownership in the Northern Russian River Watershed.
Casper Creek US Forest Service - Pacific Southwest Research Station. 1998. Proceedings of the conference on coastal watersheds: the Caspar Creek Story. General Technical Report PSW-GTR-168-Web
Streams
Assessment Methods California Department of Fish and Game 1999. California Stream Bioassessment Procedure: Protocol Brief for Biological and Physical Habitat Assessment in Wadeable Streams. California Department of Fish and Game, Water Pollution Control Laboratory, Aquatic Bioassessment Laboratory, Revision Date, May, 1999. Available on the Web at http://www.dfg.ca.gov/cabw/cabwhome.html
Assessment Methods Barbour, M.T., J. Gerritsen, B.D. Snyder, and J.B. Stribling. 1999. Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for Use in Streams and Wadeable Rivers: Periphyton, Benthic Macroinvertebrates and Fish, Second Edition. EPA 841-B-99-002. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; Office of Water; Washington, D.C.
Assessment Methods National Resource Conservation Service. 2005. Stream Restoration Design Handbook, Draft 2.
Assessment Methods National Resource Conservation Service. 2001. Stream Corridor Inventory and Assessment Techniques: A guide to site, project and landscape approaches suitable for local conservation programs.
Assessment Methods USEPA - Office of Water. 2006. Draft Wadeable Streams Assessment: A Collaborative Survey of the Nations Streams. EPA 841-B-06-002
Assessment Methods Boyer, K. 2003. Annotated Bibliography of Technical References Pertaining to Restoration of Streams and Rivers, Riparian Areas and Floodplains Version 1. NRCS Wildlife Habitat Management Institute
Assessment Methods Somerville, D. E. and Pruitt, B. A. 2004. Physical Stream Assessment: A Review of Selected Protocols for Use in the Clean Water Act Section 404 Program. September 2004, Prepared for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Wetlands, Oceans, and Watersheds, Wetlands Division (Order No. 3W-0503- NATX). Washington, D.C. 213 pp.
Assessment Methods Wohl, E. et al. 2005. River Restoration. Water Resources Research, Vol. 41, W1030, 1-12.
  Riley, S. P. D. et al. 2005. Effects of Urbanization on the Distribution and Abundance of Amphibians and Invasive Species in Southern California Streams. Conservation Biology 19: 1894-1907.
Surface Water
Surface Water Russian River Watershed Background - Hydrology
  Entrix, Inc. 2000. Russian River Biological Assessment - Interim Report 7 - Hydroelectric Projects. For Corps and Sonoma County. 
  Entrix, In.c 2002. Russian River biological assessment. Interim report 3: flow-related habitats. For Corps and Sonoma County. 
Timber Harvest
  County of Sonoma Permit and Resource Management Department. 2002. Regulating location of Timber Harvest Activities.
Vegetation
Vegetation Merenlender, Adina M., Kerry L. Heise, James W. Bartolome, Barbara H. Allen-Diaz. 2001. Monitoring shows vegetation change at multiple scales. California Agriculture 56(6): 42-46.
Vegetation Coast Mountain Range Description of Plant Communities 
Vegetation USFWS Endangered Plant Species Consultation Letter 1998. 
Vegetation Influence of Invasive Species on Coastal Plant Communities
Vegetation Plant Species Suitability for Restoration
Vegetation Jensen, M. 1995. Documentation of the modeling of potential natural vegetation at three spatial scales using biophysical settings in the Columbia River basin assessment area.
Vegetation Invasive
Invasive Vegetation Influence of Invasive Species on Coastal Plant Communities. 
Invasive Vegetation DiTomaso, J.M. and D.W. Johnson (eds.). 2006. The Use of Fire as a Tool for Controlling Invasive Plants. Cal-IPC Publication 2006-01. California Invasive Plant Council: Berkeley, CA. 56 pp.
Invasive Vegetation "Invasive Grass Sparks Watershed-Wide Stream Restoration Effort" by Karen Gaffney
Invasive Vegetation Gaffney, K.A. and K. Gledhill. 2004. Giant Reed in the Russian River Riparian Zone: Distribution, Plant Community Effects and Control Methods in Proceedings of the Riparian Habitat and Floodplains Conference, March 12 - 14, 2001, Sacramento, California
Invasive Vegetation Gaffney, K.A. No Date. A watershed approach to Arundo donax removal and riparian restoration.
Vernal Pools
Vernal Pools Heise, K. L., A. M. Merenlender, and G. Giusti. 1996. Vernal pools in California's Oak Woodlands: Puddles or Unique Habitats? Oaks 'n' Folks 11(2).
Vernal Pools Heise, K.L. and A. Merenlender. 1999. Flora of a vernal pool complex in the Mayacmas Mountains of southeastern Mendocino county, California. Madrono 46(1): 38-45.
Vernal Pools California Vernal Pools Bibliography
Vineyards
Vineyards Merenlender, Adina M.. 1999. A Spatially Explicit Vineyard Expansion Model: Addressing Crop Production, Public Policy, and Environmental Concerns
Watershed
Assessment Methods Zielenski, J. 2002. Watershed Vulnerability Analysis. Center for Watershed Protection
Assessment Methods
Keithly, C. 2000. A map based approach to watershed Assessment. California Department of Forestry, Fire Resource Assessment Program.
Assessment Methods Bleier, C. et. al. 2003. North Coast Watershed Assessment Program Methods Manual. California Resources Agency and California Environmental Protection Agency, Sacramento, CA. 191 pages.
Assessment Methods Peer Review Comments on: Bleier, C. et. al. 2003. North Coast Watershed Assessment Program Methods Manual. California Resources Agency and California Environmental Protection Agency, Sacramento, CA. 191 pages.
Assessment Methods Oregon Watershed Assessment Method.
Assessment Methods Washington Watershed Assessment Method.
Assessment Methods Costick, L. A. 1996. Indexing current watershed conditions using remote sensing and GIS.
Assessment Methods Zabel, C. J. et al. 200? A Collaborative Approach in Adaptive Management at a Large-landscape Scale. Chapter in unknown book.
Assessment Methods North Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board. 2005. Watershed Planning Chapter
  Merenlender, Adina and Colin Brooks. 1997. Integrating Information at State, Regional and Local Scales: An Essential Step for Watershed Management, Restoration, and Monitoring. Oaks 'n' Folks - 12(2).
Management Plan Vigmostad, K. E. et al. 2005. Large Scale Ecosystem Restoration: Lessons for Existing and Emerging Initiatives.
  Watershed Analysis and Management Guide for Tribes
  Shilling, F. et al. 2005. California Watershed Assessment Manual. Volume 1. Prepared for the California Resources Agency and the California Bay-Delta Authority.
  Shilling, F. et al. 2004. California Watershed Assessment Guide. Prepared for the California Resources Agency.
  Bartholow, J. et al. 2001. Getting Results with SIAM for the Klamath River
  Grossinger, R. et al. 2004. Ecological, Geomorphic, and Land Use History of the Carneros Creek Watershed: A Component of the Watershed Management Plan for the Carneros Creek Watershed, Napa County, California. Prepared for Stewardship Support and Watershed Assessment in the Napa River Watershed: A Calfed Project
  Klamt, Robert R., C. LeDoux-Bloom, J. Clements, M. Fuller , D. Morse, and M. Scruggs (multidisciplinary team leads). 2002. Gualala River Watershed Assessment Report. North Coast Watershed Assessment Program, 367pp plus Appendices. California Resources Agency, and California Environmental Protection Agency, Sacramento, California.
  Sonoma County Water Agency. Fisheries Enhancement Program
  Integrated Planning Work Group - California Watersheds Council. 2004. Priniciples for Integrated Planning in Watersheds.
  California Watersheds Council. 2003. California Agency Watershed Management Strategic Plan.
  California Watershed Portal
  Sonoma County Agricultural Preservation and Open Space District. 2000. Acquisition Plan: A Blueprint for Agricultural and Open Space Preservation.
  Mendocino Redwood Company LLC. 2003. Willow and Freezeout Creeks Watershed Analysis
  San Francisco Planning Department. 2001. Penisula Watershed Management Plan
  California Floodplain Management Task Force Recommendations
  USEPA - Office of Water. 2005. Handbook for Developing Watershed Plans to Restore and Protect our Waters.
  Pacific Rivers Council. 2002. Watershed Restoration in the Sierra Nevada.
  Russian River Watershed Council. 2006. Russian River Watershed Directory.
Water Quality
Methods North Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board. 2003. Methods Manual for Water Quality Data Gathering and Analysis for the North Coast Watershed Assessment Program. Appendix E: NCWAP Watershed Assessment Methods Manual
Standards North Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board. 2007. Water Quality Control Plan for the North Coast Region.
Indicators Water Quality Indicators blurb
  Dodds, W. K. and R. M. Oakes. 2006. Controls on nutrients across a prairie stream watershed: land use and riparian cover effects. Environmental Management 37(5): 634-646.
  Brett, M. T. et al. 2005. Non-point-source impacts on stream nutrient concentrations along a forest to urban gradient. Environmental Management 35(3): 330-342.
  Resource Management Associates, Inc. 2001. HEC-5Q Simulation of Water Quality in the Russian River Basin.
  USEPA - Office of Wetlands, Oceans, and Watersheds. 2002. Consolidated Assessment and Listing Methodology: Toward a Compendium of Best Practices.
  Anders, Robert, Davidek, Karl, and Koczot, K.M., 2006, Water-quality data for the Lower Russian River Basin, Sonoma County, California, 2003 – 2004: U.S. Geological Survey Data Series 168, 70 p.
  Viers, J. H. 1999. Non-point source pollution modeling in the north coast of California.
  Ritter, J. R. and W. H. Brown. 1971. Turbidity and suspended sediment transport in the Russian River Basin, California. USGS Open File Report
TMDL Stillwater Sciences. 2002. Napa River Basin Limiting Factors Analysis. San Francisco Bay Water Quality Control Board.
TMDL USEPA. 1999. South Fork Eel River Total Maximum Daily Loads for Sediment and Temperature
TMDL Stillwater Sciences. 1999. South Fork Eel River Total Maximum Daily Loads: Sediment Source Analysis
Sampling Results Community Clean Water Institute. 2004. Lower Russian River Water Quality Results.
Sampling Results Community Clean Water Institute. 2004. Lower Russian River Summary Report.
Sampling Results Community Clean Water Institute. 2004. Mid Russian River Water Quality Results.
  USEPA - Impaired Waters and Total Maximum Daily Loads. Technical Support Documents
  USEPA. 2001. PLOAD Version 3.0 Users Manual. An ArcView GIS Tool to Calculate Nonpoint Sources of Pollution in Watershed and Stormwater Projects
  Literature citations on sediment quality assessment
CWA Section 303(d) Proposed 2006 CWA Section 303(d) List of Water Quality Limited Segments
Standards USEPA. 2003. EPA Region 10 Guidance for Pacific Northwest State and Tribal Temperature and Water Quality Standards. EPA 910-B-03-002
Standards Tetra Tech, Inc. 2006. Technical Approach to Develop Nutrient Numeric Endpoints for California. Prepared for USEPA Region 10.
Standards North Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board. 2006. Water Quality Control Plan for the North Coast Region.
Runoff Coefficients Mattikalli, N. M. and K. S. Richards, 1996. Estimation of Surface Water Quality Changes in Response to Land Use Change: Application of the Export Coefficient Model Using Remote Sensing and Geographic Information System. Journal of Environmental Management 48:263-282.
Runoff Coefficients Theodore A. E. and E. F. Wood. 2003. Watershed weighting of export coefficients to map critical phosphorous loading areas. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 39: 165-181.
Wildlife Habitat Relationships
  The Development and Implementation of Landscape Metrics for Reporting Forest Fragmentation at Field and Landscape Levels
  Ohmann, Janet L. 1992. Wildlife habitats of the north coast of California: new techniques for extensive forest inventory. Res. Pap. PNW-RP-440. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research
Station. 48 p.