rr_uppertribs

Metadata also available as

Metadata:


Identification_Information:
Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator:
Rr_uppertribs.shp was created by Circuit Rider Productions, Inc. Rr_uppertribs represents the portion of the riparian zone landuse/land cover area within the Russian River basin.
Publication_Date:
September 2002
Title: rr_uppertribs
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: vector digital data
Online_Linkage: \\GIS_TECH\rrgis\Vegetation\rr_uppertribs.shp
Description:
Abstract: The 1992 land use/land cover of the riparian zone polygons were digitized from 1:6,000-scale aerial photo enlargements. Rr_uppertribs.shp illustrates landuse/landcover in the riparian zone of Russian River tributaries in Mendocino County, California. This work is a result of the Upper Russian River Aggregate Resources Management Plan. Feature boundaries were interpreted from aerial photos and were
registered to a digital map based on USGS 1:1000,000-scale DLGs using the projective transformation routine in AutoCAD
Release 12.0. Manual digitizing was done on a 24" x 36" CalComp Drawing Board II digitizing tablet. ArcView 3.1 was used
to convert the AutoCAD drawings to GIS coverages by creating topology and links to the attribute data.
 
Purpose:
The purpose of this dataset is to support watershed assessment, planning and riparian mapping/analysis.
 
Supplemental Information: The accuracy of registration between aerial photo copies and the base map was measured by the RMSE calculated in map units (meters). Since the output maps for the project were to be plotted at a scale of 1:24,000, the tolerance value specified by the National Map Accuracy Standards for maps of this scale was used as a guide during the registration operation. The appropriate
RMSE value when registering the overlays to the digital base maps was 7.31520 m (or 0.010 inch in digitizer units). 82.35% of the
overlays for the 1992 drawings were able to meet this standard, and 17.65% had RMSE values of between 7.31520 m and 9.0 m.
 
Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Single_Date/Time:
Calendar_Date:
1992 ground conditions.
Currentness_Reference:
1:6,000-scale enlargements of 1992 aerial photos, printed on blueprint-quality paper ; digital maps based on USGS
1:100,000-scale DLGs; ground-truth of areas covered by riparian vegetation from 1992 ground surveys by Circuit Rider
Production staff for area covered by the Russian River Resource Enhancement Plan, (Russian River mainstem from town of
Calpella south to Hopland 101 Hwy. bridge).
Status:
Progress: complete
Maintenance_and_Update_Frequency:
none scheduled
Spatial_Domain:
Bounding_Coordinates:
West_Bounding_Coordinate: -123.297786
East_Bounding_Coordinate: -123.029670
North_Bounding_Coordinate: 39.347025
South_Bounding_Coordinate: 38.852330
Keywords:
Theme:
Theme_Keyword_Thesaurus:
Landuse, landcover, riparian, Mendocino County, Russian River, Mendocino Water Agency/Philip Williams &
Associates, Inc./Circuit Rider Productions, Inc., Upper Russian River Gravel Resource Enhancement Plan, riparian
zone, riparian corridor.
Theme_Keyword:
Landuse, landcover, riparian, Mendocino County, Russian River, Mendocino Water Agency/Philip Williams &
Associates, Inc./Circuit Rider Productions, Inc., Upper Russian River Gravel Resource Enhancement Plan, riparian
zone, riparian corridor
Access_Constraints:
none
Use_Constraints:
The responsibility of the risks associated in regards to the results and representations of using this type of spatial data is understood by the user. In all cases, the user should refer to the associated metadata files or the original source data for accuracy, currentness and appropriate contact information. CRP shall not have any liability to any person or entity with respect to liability, loss or damage caused or alleged to be caused directly or indirectly by information contained in this file.
Native_Data_Set_Environment:
Microsoft Windows 2000 Version 5.0 (Build 2195) Service Pack 2; ESRI ArcCatalog 8.2.0.700

Spatial_Data_Organization_Information:
Direct_Spatial_Reference_Method: Vector
Point_and_Vector_Object_Information:
SDTS_Terms_Description:
SDTS_Point_and_Vector_Object_Type: G-polygon
Point_and_Vector_Object_Count: 275

Spatial_Reference_Information:
Horizontal_Coordinate_System_Definition:
Planar:
Grid_Coordinate_System:
Grid_Coordinate_System_Name: Universal Transverse Mercator
Universal_Transverse_Mercator:
UTM_Zone_Number: 10
Transverse_Mercator:
Scale_Factor_at_Central_Meridian: 0.999600
Longitude_of_Central_Meridian: -123.000000
Latitude_of_Projection_Origin: 0.000000
False_Easting: 500000.000000
False_Northing: 0.000000
Planar_Coordinate_Information:
Planar_Coordinate_Encoding_Method: coordinate pair
Coordinate_Representation:
Abscissa_Resolution: 0.000128
Ordinate_Resolution: 0.000128
Planar_Distance_Units: meters
Geodetic_Model:
Horizontal_Datum_Name: North American Datum of 1983
Ellipsoid_Name: Geodetic Reference System 80
Semi-major_Axis: 6378137.000000
Denominator_of_Flattening_Ratio: 298.257222

Entity_and_Attribute_Information:
Detailed_Description:
Entity_Type:
Entity_Type_Label: rr_uppertribs
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: FID
Attribute_Definition: Internal feature number.
Attribute_Definition_Source: ESRI
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Unrepresentable_Domain:
Sequential unique whole numbers that are automatically generated.
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: Shape
Attribute_Definition: Feature geometry.
Attribute_Definition_Source: ESRI
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Unrepresentable_Domain: Coordinates defining the features.
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: ENTITY
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: LAYER
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: ELEVATION
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: THICKNESS
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: COLOR
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: POLY_NO
The identification code for an individual polygon is a whole number having from one to two digits within the range 1 to
99, inclusive.
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: AREA
The area of a given polygon in square meters as calculated by ESRI ArcView version 3.1.
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: ACRE
The area of a given polygon in acres. Acre is the result of multiplying the area in square meters (as calculated by
ArcView) by a conversion factor of 0.000247.

The minimum mapping unit for this project was .5 acre and the minimum width for any mapped polygon was
approximately 30 feet.

Attribute:
Attribute_Label: ACAD_TEXT
A numerical field containing the unique user-assigned identification number for each map polygon (it was called
ACAD_TEXT for reasons having to do with the ArcCAD GIS program). This item serves as the principal "key" for
sorting database records and relating them to the map polygons. Due to additions and deletions of polygons during the
map editing process, these ID numbers were not necessarily sequential.
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: POLY__
Some polygons have been divided by a river mile marker into two or more parts. The sub-units of such a polygon are
designated by decimal numbers.
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: BANK__
Code 7000 = Mid-Channel
Code 8000 = Right Bank (facing downstream).
Code 9000 = Left Bank (facing downstream).
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: BANK
Indicates left or right bank.
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: R_MILE
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: USGS_QUAD
U. S. Geological Survey, 7.5 Minute Series Topographic Quadrangle names.
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: AERIAL_PHO
Mendocino County, 1992 Aerial Photo Number, WAC Corporation, Eugene, Oregon. Aerial photo copy
enlargements at 1:6000 scale, (original scale 1:31,680).
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: REACH
Code 000 = York Creek
Code 100 = Feliz Creek
Code 200 = Dooley Creek
Code 300 = Russian River, south of Hopland Hwy. 101 bridge
Code 400 = Morrison Creek
Code 500 = Ackerman Creek
Code 600 = Hensley Creek
Code 700 = Forsythe Creek
Code 800 = Robinson Creek
Code 900 = Russian River, north of Calpella
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: LANDUSE
Code O (Land Use) = Open Land (i.e., mainly unvegetated land that is not presently in agricultural, industrial,
residential, commercial, transportation, or urban use, with <10% cover by herbs, shrubs, and/or trees).
Code h (Land Cover) = areas (other than gravel bars or gravel pit margins) in which open condition is clearly the result
of recent human disturbance by cutting, bulldozing, heavy vehicle traffic, etc.
Code sc (Land Cover) = a gravel bar which has recently been "scraped" or "skimmed" to obtain aggregate.
Code ot (Land Cover) = other

Code N (Land Use) = Non-Cultivated Vegetated Land (i.e., cultural, semi-natural, or natural vegetation with >10%
cover by herbs, shrubs, and/or trees).
Code fs (Land Cover) = Forbs and Shrubs predominate, although scattered small trees may be present. Use of this
category is restricted to relatively early successional vegetation in habitats normally dominated by trees.
Code rf (Land Cover) = Riparian Forest, Woodland, and/or Scrub

Landuse: Natural - Non-Cultivated Vegetated Land (i.e., cultural, semi-natural, or natural vegetation with >10% cover by
herbs, shrubs, and/or trees).

Landcover:
Forbs/Shrubs = Forbs and Shrubs predominate, although scattered small trees may be present. Use of this category is
restricted to relatively early successional vegetation in habitats normally dominated by trees.

Ripararian Forest = Riparian Forest, Woodland, and/or Scrub

Landuse: Open Land - (i.e., mainly unvegetated land that is not presently in agricultural, industrial, residential, commercial,
transportation, or urban use, with <10% cover by herbs, shrubs, and/or trees).

Landcover:
Human Disturbance = areas (other than gravel bars or gravel pit margins) in which open condition is clearly the result of recent
human disturbance by cutting, bulldozing, heavy vehicle traffic, etc.

Scraped = a gravel bar which has recently been "scraped" or "skimmed" to obtain aggregate.


Attribute:
Attribute_Label: LANDCOVER
Code O (Land Use) = Open Land (i.e., mainly unvegetated land that is not presently in agricultural, industrial,
residential, commercial, transportation, or urban use, with <10% cover by herbs, shrubs, and/or trees).
Code h (Land Cover) = areas (other than gravel bars or gravel pit margins) in which open condition is clearly the result
of recent human disturbance by cutting, bulldozing, heavy vehicle traffic, etc.
Code sc (Land Cover) = a gravel bar which has recently been "scraped" or "skimmed" to obtain aggregate.
Code ot (Land Cover) = other

Code N (Land Use) = Non-Cultivated Vegetated Land (i.e., cultural, semi-natural, or natural vegetation with >10%
cover by herbs, shrubs, and/or trees).
Code fs (Land Cover) = Forbs and Shrubs predominate, although scattered small trees may be present. Use of this
category is restricted to relatively early successional vegetation in habitats normally dominated by trees.
Code rf (Land Cover) = Riparian Forest, Woodland, and/or Scrub

Landuse: Natural - Non-Cultivated Vegetated Land (i.e., cultural, semi-natural, or natural vegetation with >10% cover by
herbs, shrubs, and/or trees).

Landcover:
Forbs/Shrubs = Forbs and Shrubs predominate, although scattered small trees may be present. Use of this category is
restricted to relatively early successional vegetation in habitats normally dominated by trees.

Ripararian Forest = Riparian Forest, Woodland, and/or Scrub

Landuse: Open Land - (i.e., mainly unvegetated land that is not presently in agricultural, industrial, residential, commercial,
transportation, or urban use, with <10% cover by herbs, shrubs, and/or trees).

Landcover:
Human Disturbance = areas (other than gravel bars or gravel pit margins) in which open condition is clearly the result of recent
human disturbance by cutting, bulldozing, heavy vehicle traffic, etc.

Scraped = a gravel bar which has recently been "scraped" or "skimmed" to obtain aggregate.

Attribute:
Attribute_Label: WHR
The California Natural Diversity Data Base (CNDDB) and the Wildlife Habitat Relationships (WHR) system are used
by the Department of Fish and Game to classify vegetation communities and wildlife habitats throughout the state (see
Airola 1988; Holland 1986; Mayer and Laudenslayer 1988). In the present study, CRP used both of these systems to
classify polygons, in addition to the land use/land cover classification scheme presented above. The approximate
correspondences among these three classification systems is given in the following table, for those land cover units that
may occur in the study area:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Land Cover Units Used in this Study, and Their Approximate Correspondence to Units in the WHRHabitat Type and
CNDDB Natural Community Type Classification Systems1
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Land Cover Units WHR WHR CNDDB
Used In This Study Codes Habitats Codes
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Riparian Forest VRI Valley-Foothill Riparian 61400
Riparian Forest VRI Valley-Foothill Riparian 63400

Notes:
1CNDDB codes are generally based on R. F. Holland (1986), and R. F. Holland's WHR-CNDDB correlations in the
"Crosswalk Table" on pp. 23-39 in Mayer and Laudenslayer (1988). WHR Habitat names and codes are those listed
in Mayer and Laudenslayer (1988) and the California Department of Fish and Game's WHR Computer Database
(version 5.0). Since the intention of the WHR system is to classify major vegetative complexes at a scale sufficient to
predict wildlife habitat relationships, most of its categories are at the association level of a vegetation classification or
higher. A WHR habitat is generally broader than a "natural Community" type in the CNDDB system; i.e., a WHR
habitat often encompasses more than one CNDDB community type.

Where disturbance has removed a pre-existing tree cover and tree species have not yet re-colonized a site to any
significant degree, the WHR system allows the coding of such units as the "seedling stage" of a tree-dominated habitat.
In this project we preferred not to make assumptions regarding potential vegetation development; all such units were
coded on the basis of their presently existing cover (e.g., "Open", "Grassland", or "Forbs and Shrubs").

3All Grassland/Savanna cover units were assumed to be WHR Annual Grassland, unless determined by ground truth to
be Perennial Grassland.

Attribute:
Attribute_Label: CNDDB
The California Natural Diversity Data Base (CNDDB) and the Wildlife Habitat Relationships (WHR) system are used
by the Department of Fish and Game to classify vegetation communities and wildlife habitats throughout the state (see
Airola 1988; Holland 1986; Mayer and Laudenslayer 1988). In the present study, CRP used both of these systems to
classify polygons, in addition to the land use/land cover classification scheme presented above. The approximate
correspondences among these three classification systems is given in the following table, for those land cover units that
may occur in the study area:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Land Cover Units Used in this Study, and Their Approximate Correspondence to Units in the WHRHabitat Type and
CNDDB Natural Community Type Classification Systems1
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Land Cover Units WHR WHR CNDDB
Used In This Study Codes Habitats Codes
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Riparian Forest VRI Valley-Foothill Riparian 61400
Riparian Forest VRI Valley-Foothill Riparian 63400

Notes:
1CNDDB codes are generally based on R. F. Holland (1986), and R. F. Holland's WHR-CNDDB correlations in the
"Crosswalk Table" on pp. 23-39 in Mayer and Laudenslayer (1988). WHR Habitat names and codes are those listed
in Mayer and Laudenslayer (1988) and the California Department of Fish and Game's WHR Computer Database
(version 5.0). Since the intention of the WHR system is to classify major vegetative complexes at a scale sufficient to
predict wildlife habitat relationships, most of its categories are at the association level of a vegetation classification or
higher. A WHR habitat is generally broader than a "natural Community" type in the CNDDB system; i.e., a WHR
habitat often encompasses more than one CNDDB community type.

Where disturbance has removed a pre-existing tree cover and tree species have not yet re-colonized a site to any
significant degree, the WHR system allows the coding of such units as the "seedling stage" of a tree-dominated habitat.
In this project we preferred not to make assumptions regarding potential vegetation development; all such units were
coded on the basis of their presently existing cover (e.g., "Open", "Grassland", or "Forbs and Shrubs").

3All Grassland/Savanna cover units were assumed to be WHR Annual Grassland, unless determined by ground truth to
be Perennial Grassland.

Attribute:
Attribute_Label: LANDFORM
Main Stem River Channel
Code I = Immediate Bank: a narrow bank which makes an abrupt transition between the wetted channel and the upper
terrace, with no intervening in-channel terrace or gravel bar.
Code Tc = In-Channel Terrace: areas of intermediate elevation located between a gravel bar and the outer channel
bank/upper terrrace. In-channel terraces may be in various stages of hummock formation, or they may be
more-or-less level if the hummocks have already coalesced.
Code P = Point Bar or Alternate Bar: gravel bars formed at bends in a stream's thalweg that follow bends in the stream
channel are called point bars; bars formed where there is a meandering thalweg within a straight stream
channel are called alternate bars. There is a gradation between the two types of bars which often makes them
difficult to distinguish; they are therefore lumped together here.

Code Wc = Wetted channel: that portion of the river's main
channel (or a back channel connected to the main channel) in which surface water is visible.
Code M = Mid-Channel Island, or emergent "riffle bar"

Immediate Bank: a narrow bank which makes an abrupt transition between the wetted channel and the upper terrace, with no
intervening in-channel terrace or gravel bar.

Point Bar or Alternate Bar: gravel bars formed at bends in a stream's thalweg that follow bends in the stream channel are
called point bars; bars formed where there is a meandering thalweg within a straight stream channel are called alternate bars.
There is a gradation between the two types of bars which often makes them difficult to distinguish; they are therefore lumped
together here.

In-Channel Terrace: areas of intermediate elevation located between a gravel bar and the outer channel bank/upper terrrace.
In-channel terraces may be in various stages of hummock formation, or they may be more-or-less level if the hummocks have
already coalesced.

Mid-Channel Island: emergent "riffle bar".

Attribute:
Attribute_Label: CANOPY
Canopy closure as estimated from aerial photos
("Photo-Closure") was classified into three categories:

Code L = Low; from "10"% (i.e., 5-15%) up to "40"% (i.e., 35-45%)
Code M = Medium; from > "40"% up to "70"% (i.e., 65-75%)
Code H = High; from > "70"% up to 100%

Note: The standard WHR system uses four classes for percent canopy closure (i.e., 10-24%, 25-39%, 40-59%,
60-100%). In the present project it was not feasible to distinguish such narrowly-defined categories because of the
less-than-optimum quality of the available aerial photos; we therefore used the three broad classes defined above. In
effect our scheme combined the first two WHR categories ("Sparse" and "Open") into a single class, while retaining
classes similar to the WHR's "Moderate" and "Dense" categories.

Note: Our class boundaries for percent canopy closure were deliberately "fuzzy"; i.e., instead of a class boundary being
a single percentage value, our threshold criteria spanned a range of values. The dividing line between canopy closure
classes was drawn by eye where there was a "noticeable change" in canopy density that fell within these ranges on the
photos; the actual location of the line was therefore a matter of the judgement of the photo-interpreter. According to
Thompson (1987) a similar procedure is used by USGS to produce vegetation cover information on 7.5 minute quad
maps.

Attribute:
Attribute_Label: COVER
A rough visual estimate of the percentage of ground surface within the entire polygon covered by vegetation of any type.
Codes and categories for cover followed Northen's terminology (Northen 1991; 1992):

Code u = "unvegetated" (<10% cover)
Code s = "sparsely vegetated" (11% - 50% cover)
Code c = "well vegetated" (> 50% cover)

Attribute:
Attribute_Label: CROWN_SZ
We used 1:2,400-scale aerial photos and ground-truthing to classify vegetation in terms of the average crown diameter
of overstory trees. However, we modified the criteria of the WHR system (Mayer and Laudenslayer 1988) by
dropping the "multi-layered" class (because it combines layering and cover criteria rather than just tree size), and
lumping the remaining five WHR classes into three categories, as follows:

Code A = Seedling to Sapling size (<15'; WHR codes 1 and 2)
Code B = Pole to Small size (15'-45'; WHR codes 3 and 4)
Code C = Medium to Large size (>45'; WHR code 5)

Note: The use of these three broad size classes was a deliberate tradeoff, intended to improve the classification
accuracy by accepting some loss of precision.

Note: The WHR system assumes that there is a consistent relationship between crown diameter and dbh which can be
applied to all species of conifers on the one hand and all species of hardwoods on the other. No doubt this is an
over-simplification, but it enables the user of the WHR system to obtain a rough estimate of average tree dbh from
aerial photos in areas or time periods for which ground truth data may be unavailable.

The table below gives the correspondences among size class, conifer crown diameter, hardwood crown diameter, and
dbh class that are assumed in the WHR system (Mayer and Laudenslayer 1988). Also shown are the actual sizes of
tree crown images as they appear on aerial photos at the scales which were used in this project:

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WHR WHR WHR WHR WHR Hdwood Crown Hdwood Crown
Code Size Conifer Hardwood dbh Diam. on 1:6,000 Diam. on 1:2,400
Class Crown Diam. Crown Diam. Class Aerial Photos Aerial Photos
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 Seedling n/a n/a < 1" n/a n/a
2 Sapling n/a < 15' 1-6" < 0.8 mm < 1.9 mm
3 Pole < 12' 15-30' 6-11" 0.8 - 1.5 mm 1.9 - 3.8 mm
4 Small 12-24' 30-45' 11-24" 1.5 - 2.3 mm 3.8 - 5.7 mm
5 Med/Large > 24' > 45' > 24" > 2.3 mm > 5.7 mm
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Attribute:
Attribute_Label: AV_DBH
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: SUC_STATUS

 

Distribution_Information:
Resource_Description: Downloadable Data
Standard_Order_Process:
Digital_Form:
Digital_Transfer_Information:
Transfer_Size: 0.512

Metadata_Reference_Information:
Metadata_Date: 20021023
Metadata_Contact:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Organization_Primary:
Contact_Organization:
Circuit Rider Productions, Inc.
Contact_Person: David Bennett, GIS Coordinator
Contact_Address:
Address_Type:
9619 Old Redwood Highway
City: Windsor
State_or_Province: California
Postal_Code: 95492
Contact_Voice_Telephone:
707-838-6641
Metadata_Standard_Name: FGDC Content Standards for Digital Geospatial Metadata
Metadata_Standard_Version: FGDC-STD-001-1998
Metadata_Time_Convention: local time
Metadata_Extensions:
Online_Linkage: <http://www.esri.com/metadata/esriprof80.html>
Profile_Name: ESRI Metadata Profile

Generated by mp version 2.7.3 on Wed Oct 23 11:44:20 2002